Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I represent a company in an effort to settle an employee’s discrimination claim. The employee’s lawyer seems to be on a crusade against the company, and appears to have no interest in settlement. Her strategy is to seek to try the matter in order to boost her profile for other cases, whether or not that is in her client’s best interests. The company suspects she is not adequately communicating with her client about its position and generous offer. My client contact has always had a good relationship with the employee and wants me to prepare specific talking points to use to approach the employee directly. May I do so?
Continue Reading October 15 Issue – Scripting Communications for Client with Adverse PartyThe twice-monthly “Dear Ethics Lawyer” column is part of a training regimen of the Legal Ethics Project, authored by Mark Hinderks, former managing partner and counsel to an AmLaw 200 firm. Read More
October 2024
October 1 Issue – Permissive Withdrawal
By Mark Hinderks on
Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I am representing a client in a transaction. The client is extraordinarily difficult and wants to argue about everything, but he is not doing anything illegal or fraudulent and has not asked me to do anything unethical. He has also fallen three months behind on paying his bills and routinely asserts, without basis, that we are not doing a very good job of representing him. Life’s too short—can we just withdraw?
Continue Reading October 1 Issue – Permissive Withdrawal