Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I am a three-year lawyer who recently went in-house after being an associate at a law firm. I now have some issues. I work with and for a more senior lawyer who is the Deputy General Counsel for our employer, the number two in our law department. Under his direction, I have been constructing a privileged log for a large matter we’re involved in. He told me to claim privilege as to any email or document that has a lawyer’s name on it or in it, whether or not it was seeking or providing legal advice, but then describe the document on the log as involving communication with the lawyer about legal advice. He said this is how it’s done all the time and it’s perfectly appropriate. I don’t think this is true, but can I rely on his direction to do this? I need the job and he won’t be there forever.
Continue Reading September 15, 2026 Issue – Subordinate Lawyer in Corporate Law DepartmentThe twice-monthly “Dear Ethics Lawyer” column is part of a training regimen of the Legal Ethics Project, authored by Mark Hinderks, former managing partner and counsel to an AmLaw 200 firm. Read More
Miscellaneous
August 17, 2026 Issue – Conflict of In-House Lawyer with Former Employer
Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I am an in-house lawyer for a utility company, part of a six-person law department. For many years, I worked for a smaller utility company in another state before being recruited to my current employer/client. At our morning meeting today, I learned that we are a part of a substantial regulatory case involving a rule-making proceeding and that we are adverse (on the other side of a major issue) to my former employer. Is this a problem? Is there something I should do?
Continue Reading August 17, 2026 Issue – Conflict of In-House Lawyer with Former EmployerMay 15, 2026 Issue – Reporting Lawyer Who Violates the Rules
Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I have a question about the duty to report professional misconduct. I have learned that a lawyer (Bill) in our firm accidentally copied a lawyer from another firm with an email intended for a client, discussing the client’s matter and including confidential and privileged information. It happened when the autofill function of the email program filled in an email address from Bill’s contacts instead of the client’s email address which begins with similar letters. Bill did not catch the error before he hit send. Fortunately, the lawyer who received it was not adverse to this particular client and readily agreed to delete the email.
On the face of it, however, the communication violated Rule 1.6 (“a lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client” without client consent), but it was a simple and understandable mistake that could happen to any of us. And what if the client does not want to report it because it doesn’t want the contents of the email to be shared with the authorities? Do I have a duty to report this to the disciplinary authorities in our state?
February 16, 2026 Issue – Disclosure to Support Motion to Withdraw
Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I have represented a client in litigation who has become very difficult. The client has admitted to withholding relevant documents that should be produced in discovery, and has instructed me not to acknowledge it or reveal it to the other side or the court. In addition, based upon conversations I’ve had privately with the client, I believe the client has been untruthful in deposition testimony, but refuses to correct that testimony. And to compound matters, the client has not paid our billings in six months.
I believe that I am required to withdraw from the representation under our state’s version of Rule 1.16(a)(1) and that I have a basis for permissive withdrawal under Rule 1.16(b)(2),(3),(4),(5) and (6). The client refuses to consent to the withdrawal. So how much of this can I put in the motion to withdraw in order to obtain court approval? I am mindful of the need to preserve client confidentiality under Rule 1.6, but continuing to represent this client would put me at serious risk of violating the law and the rules of professional conduct, and having the opposing party accuse me of conduct giving rise to liability.
February 2, 2026 Issue – Post-Withdrawal Duties
Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, We represented a difficult client in a litigation matter for a little over a year until it became apparent that they were not being truthful with us, and they also fell months behind on paying our fees. We withdrew from the representation after complying with applicable court rules as required by Model Rule 1.16(c) as adopted in our jurisdiction. Now, a few months later, we have received a demand from our former client to provide to new counsel they have engaged “a memorandum that includes a complete summary of all work we had performed; and all facts we had gathered, with citation and copies of sources; and legal arguments and strategies with case and statutory citation.” We understand we have some responsibility for “steps . . .reasonably practicable to protect a client’s interests,” as required by Model Rule 1.16(d), but this seems way beyond what is specified there. We are prepared to hand over the client file. But responding to this would require us to create an extensive memorandum, refreshing ourselves on matters we’ve set aside, and doing additional work—for free. What is our duty here?
Continue Reading February 2, 2026 Issue – Post-Withdrawal DutiesOctober 15, 2025 Issue – Gifts to Judges
Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, A state court judge is retiring after what seems like 105 years on the bench. A retirement party is scheduled to occur 3 days before the judge’s retirement becomes effective. A group of lawyers on behalf of the local bar is collecting money to buy tickets for a European vacation to present to the judge at the retirement party. As far as the Model Rules are concerned, may we contribute?
Continue Reading October 15, 2025 Issue – Gifts to JudgesJune 16, 2025 Issue – What is “Knowingly”
Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I am a civil trial lawyer. I have a question about Rule 3.3 Candor to the Tribunal, which says that a lawyer shall not “knowingly” offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. On several occasions I have put a client witness on the stand whose testimony seems implausible in some regard, but I couldn’t prove it to be false, or have certainty that it was false. It makes me uncomfortable, but then again, sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction. Where is the line here? When do I “know” something to be false rather than just have a doubt or question about it?
Continue Reading June 16, 2025 Issue – What is “Knowingly”May 1, 2025 Issue – Gifts for Referral
Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, My good client Johnson recommended me to another prospect who has hired me for a major case. Can I properly give Johnson a nice gift certificate as a “thank you” for his recommendation?
Continue Reading May 1, 2025 Issue – Gifts for ReferralNovember 15, 2024 Issue – Choice of Law
Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, You have been telling us for years that we have to check the version of the Model Rules in effect wherever we are admitted, or where a case or transaction is, where we are proposing to do various things, or where our client is, i.e., that the rules are often different in different states. I’ve got that.
But how do we know, when the rules are different between two states, which state’s law applies? If they are inconsistent in a way that means we can’t comply with both, are we simply up the proverbial creek without an ethical paddle? Is there any guidance out there?
August 1, 2024 Issue – Gen AI ABA Formal Op. 512
Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I have the luck/misfortune to lead a medium-sized firm. For a while now, all the buzz has been about AI and Generative AI. The talk is seemingly split between cautionary tales about how one shouldn’t use Gen AI because of various ethical and malpractice concerns; and talk about how those firms that don’t adopt it will be failing ethical obligations to serve their clients more efficiently, and will also be left in the dust by their competitors to boot.
What are our ethical obligations? And to the extent we do invest in Gen AI, and serve our clients at less cost to them and more to us, how do we ethically charge for that? Also, if increased efficiency means billing fewer hours, have technology companies just taken over another piece of our business?