The twice-monthly “Dear Ethics Lawyer” column is part of a training regimen of the Legal Ethics Project, authored by Mark Hinderks, former managing partner and counsel to an AmLaw 200 firm. Read More

2024

Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I am a lawyer admitted in a couple of Midwestern states, representing a client in a state where I am licensed that has a dispute with an opposing party in a state where I am not licensed. For various reasons, if the case cannot be settled and the facts develop as I expect, we will most likely file suit in that other state, at which time I’ll get local counsel and get admitted pro hac vice. Until then, can I rely upon the temporary practice provisions of Model Rule 5.5 to attend a pre-litigation settlement meeting without local counsel, and to do some pre-suit investigation and witness interviews, either there or by zoom from a state where I am licensed?

Continue Reading December 16 Issue – Multijurisdictional Litigation Practice

Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I filed suit for a client, among other things seeking interim relief in the form of a temporary restraining order. I gave notice to the defendant of an immediate hearing on the motion. They quickly engaged an attorney who came to the hearing, but knows nothing about the case yet. Do I have an obligation to inform the court and opposing counsel of material facts that run against my effort to secure a TRO, in making my argument at the hearing?

Continue Reading December 2 Issue – Ethical Obligations – ex parte Hearings

Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, You have been telling us for years that we have to check the version of the Model Rules in effect wherever we are admitted, or where a case or transaction is, where we are proposing to do various things, or where our client is, i.e., that the rules are often different in different states. I’ve got that.

But how do we know, when the rules are different between two states, which state’s law applies? If they are inconsistent in a way that means we can’t comply with both, are we simply up the proverbial creek without an ethical paddle? Is there any guidance out there?

Continue Reading November 15 Issue – Choice of Law

Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I have recently developed an expertise concerning a new and complex federal regulation of the importation of spirits as a result of my work for a liquor industry client. I would like to develop a practice in the area but do not have any other contacts in the industry. With the assistance of marketing folks, I have now developed an industry list and a slick promotional piece highlighting expertise on the new regulation that I want to mail to every company on the list. Are there any ethical issues?

Continue Reading November 4 Issue – Direct Mail Marketing

Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I represent a company in an effort to settle an employee’s discrimination claim. The employee’s lawyer seems to be on a crusade against the company, and appears to have no interest in settlement. Her strategy is to seek to try the matter in order to boost her profile for other cases, whether or not that is in her client’s best interests. The company suspects she is not adequately communicating with her client about its position and generous offer. My client contact has always had a good relationship with the employee and wants me to prepare specific talking points to use to approach the employee directly. May I do so?

Continue Reading October 15 Issue – Scripting Communications for Client with Adverse Party

Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I am representing a client in a transaction. The client is extraordinarily difficult and wants to argue about everything, but he is not doing anything illegal or fraudulent and has not asked me to do anything unethical. He has also fallen three months behind on paying his bills and routinely asserts, without basis, that we are not doing a very good job of representing him. Life’s too short—can we just withdraw?

Continue Reading October 1 Issue – Permissive Withdrawal

Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, A new business has moved into my area of practice and opened a substantial facility. I am very knowledgeable about an area of law they are involved in, and believe I can provide them with effective service. Is it ethical for me to cold-call the President of the company to invite her to lunch to discuss my expertise and their legal needs? Alternatively, can I write the President to explain and offer my services? 

Continue Reading September 16 Issue – Direct Solicitation

Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, Last year, I negotiated a complex and lengthy contract for a client. The client has now been sued for breach of the contract. The case will turn on a pivotal issue of contract interpretation and the intent of the parties. The client will likely want me to be a witness as I was part of all the dealings with the other side. Can our firm defend the suit? What if my recollection of the negotiations differs substantially from our client’s on a critical issue? 

Continue Reading September 3 Issue – Lawyer as Witness

Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, My no-good brother-in-law has been fired, again. I know this because after downing his customary six-pack of Old Milwaukee at a family barbecue, he gave me all the excruciating details, including his view that he was fired because of his age and some younger workers brought in, although he did concede that he might not have worked very hard.

I listened as politely as I could to this tale of woe. When at the end of it all, he asked what he should do about a discrimination claim, I told him somewhat absent-mindedly that his recourse would be to file a discrimination charge against his employer with the EEOC. I never discussed representing him. Now, months later, I see a conflicts check request at our firm showing his former employer as an existing client of the firm, and my brother-in-law as the adverse party. The nature of the matter? Defend an age discrimination charge, of course. I would not be involved in the matter, but does my firm have a conflict here?

Continue Reading August 15 Issue – Conflict from Inadvertent Attorney Client Relationship

Q: Dear Ethics Lawyer, I have the luck/misfortune to lead a medium-sized firm. For a while now, all the buzz has been about AI and Generative AI. The talk is seemingly split between cautionary tales about how one shouldn’t use Gen AI because of various ethical and malpractice concerns; and talk about how those firms that don’t adopt it will be failing ethical obligations to serve their clients more efficiently, and will also be left in the dust by their competitors to boot.

What are our ethical obligations? And to the extent we do invest in Gen AI, and serve our clients at less cost to them and more to us, how do we ethically charge for that? Also, if increased efficiency means billing fewer hours, have technology companies just taken over another piece of our business?

Continue Reading August 1 Issue – Gen AI ABA Formal Op. 512